"Heart disease is a 20th Century
affliction derived from the use of modern, convenience foods,
that has led to malnutrition and stress on the system."
— C. C.
|
|
The
Real Culprits in Heart Disease
— by
Cynthia Cechota
In the last issue of
CR, this column tackled the role of cholesterol in the human body
and the myth that cholesterol causes heart disease. If, as I argued,
cholesterol is a necessary substance in our bodies and is not a
culprit in heart disease, then what is?
Prior to 1920, heart disease was a rare phenomenon. In
fact, when a young doctor named Paul Dudley White presented the German
electrocardiograph to his Harvard colleagues, they encouraged
him to concentrate on a more profitable venture. The new machine revealed
blocked arteries, an infrequent condition in patients
at the time. However, by the mid-1950s, heart disease was
the leading cause of death in the U.S. What could be the
cause of such a dramatic change? How could heart disease be rare
in 1920, and commonplace less than 40 years later?
Food du Jour: 1880
To answer these questions, we first must explore what
was being served in kitchens and dining rooms across
America pre-1920. Historian Harvey Levenstein
contends in his book, Revolution at the Table: The Transformation
of the American Diet, that the most dramatic changes in
the U.S. diet occurred between 1880 and 1930.
These changes were a result of many sociological factors and technological
advances, including the development of the modern cooking
range; the rise of a low-cost, efficient transportation
system; the advent of new ways to preserve food;
and the birth of our modern processed food industry (Pillsbury,
1998, p. 54). Another factor was the greatly expanded
food supply that resulted from the settling of
the American West (Levenstein, p.29).
In 1880, the dinner tables of the various classes looked
something like this:
Upper Class
(dinner party) |
Middle Class
(dinner party) |
Working Class
(urbanites) |
Poor Southern
(tenant farmers) |
| Raw oysters |
Raw oysters |
Salted meats |
Bacon |
| Soup |
Baked fish |
Fresh meats |
Corn pone |
| Hors d’oeuvre |
Cheese soufflé |
Potatoes |
Coffee/molasses |
| Lamb |
Roast chicken |
Cabbage |
Seasonal: greens, berries |
| Beef fillet |
Mashed potatoes |
Bread |
Wild game (time permitting) |
| Chicken wings w/green peas |
Green peas |
Cakes |
|
| Lamb chops w/ Cranberry jelly, beans, artichokes |
Celery |
Pies |
|
| Sorbet (to clear palate) |
Coffee |
|
|
| Duck |
Oyster patties |
|
|
| Quail |
Salad |
|
|
| Ice creams |
Sherbet |
|
|
| Confections |
Pudding |
|
|
| Coffee |
Sponge cake |
|
|
| |
Fruit |
|
|
| |
Coffee |
|
|
Notice the heavy reliance on a
variety of meats and the many courses included
in the upper class diet. The men were often rotund and
it was fashionable in 1880 for women to be fleshy.
However, their portliness was attributed to an overabundance of
food. (Yet they did not suffer from heart disease!)
Paradoxically the poor southern tenant farmers of the time were
often malnourished. It is interesting to note that Northern
farmers, although poor, were healthier than those in the
South. They were not tied to tyrannical landowners, as were their
Southern counterparts. Northerners could raise and process
their own food, while the Southern poor relied upon the
monopolies of their employers to sell them the small selection that
made up their diet at every meal. Only those who could afford them
consumed eggs, butter, and milk on a regular basis. Of course, these
are considered staples in a 21st Century diet.
As a result of the costly refining process, white flour and white sugar
were more expensive. Therefore, sorghum, molasses, and brown sugar
were more common in the middle and lower income families. The rich obviously
imbibed on plenty of refined confections. However, the ingestion of
plenty of animal products provided fat-soluble activators,
which encouraged absorption of vitamins, minerals, and other nutrients.
The Birth of Processed Foods
Americans living in the thirty-four years between
1880 and World War I experienced radical changes
in the food industry. The Midwest was producing great
quantities of wheat and dairy that were being shipped via railroad
to the East. More food meant the need for new technology
to enhance preservation. And who rose to the occasion?
The giant food corporations that began extolling the virtues of
such products as Kellogg’s Corn Flakes and Post’s Grape-Nuts
and Toasties. These products were touted as health foods
to the middle class who were quick to embrace this new,
modern thinking. Nabisco, Heinz, Van Camp,
and Campbell soon became household names and
their products were accepted as equivalent to traditional foods
in all respects.
Around 1900, the American Sugar Refining Company (a giant
sugar corporation that marketed its well known “Domino” brand)
mounted a successful campaign to denigrate brown sugar. This
is another example of the public accepting the “wisdom” of the
food industry, as cookbooks began warning cooks about microbe infestations
in brown sugar. Unfortunately, consumers were already convinced
that white products were superior to brown ones. Even poor farmers
gave up their consumption of molasses and homemade sorghum, while workers abandoned
their intake of molasses and brown sugar. In the thirty-five years between
1880 and 1915, the per capita consumption of white refined sugar doubled.
In 1911, the first trans fat, “Crisco,” was mass
marketed to housewives as a healthier, more modern alternative to
strong-smelling lard. Crisco was originally developed as a
lard substitute for candles ad soap, but with electrification, the
new product needed a new market. The Story of Crisco, published
by Proctor and Gamble in 1913, brilliantly but subtly convinced wives
and mothers across the U.S. that they would be better wives
and mothers if they used Crisco. One chapter is entitled, “The
Importance of Giving Children Crisco Foods.” The book contained
615 recipes, each including Crisco as an ingredient. As a result, butter
and lard were suddenly condemned as “old-fashioned.”
In 1915, the pasteurization of milk became mandatory by law. This
was an unfortunate response to the high infant mortality of the day and unsanitary
city dairies and milk outlets. There was much controversy and speculation
about the true cause of the 50 percent mortality rate of children five
and younger. The champions of breast-feeding claimed it was the result
of artificial feeding, or the lack of breast milk. The artificial feeding proponents
claimed it was the unsanitary dairy and citywide milk outlets. Although babies
from all classes who were not breast-fed suffered a three to five times higher
mortality rate than those who were breast-fed, the studies were not able to
pinpoint artificial feeding as the main correlation. Instead, a relationship
between declining family income and infant mortality was finally made in 1924.
Declining income resulted in poor maternal nutrition, which meant smaller babies
and more susceptibility to disease. Nevertheless, the decline in infant
mortality after 1915 was credited to pasteurization.
Food du Jour: 1930
By 1930, America had been “dry” for
ten years. Most of us are probably unaware that the
policies of Prohibition had a profound effect on the American
diet. The French chefs hired by the upper class and elegant
restaurants were either living on the streets or buying their
tickets to return home. Prohibition, therefore, closed
down many fine restaurants whose liquor sales provided
the majority of their revenue. In their absence, small
diners catering to the lunch hour market quickly
sprang up. These luncheonettes and self-service cafeterias served
canned foods, soft drinks, salads, cold dishes, and sandwiches
on toast. A 1924 study shows the great changes that took
place in American restaurants since Prohibition:
“[F]irst a recognition of the rise
of calorie-consciousness, exemplified
by calorie-counting menus which ‘capitalized on and furthered
the growing
public interest in scientific eating’; second, they reflected
the great increases in vegetable consumption, particularly by men; and third, ‘the
menu with unpronounceable French names in giving way to the Americanized
menu’” (Levenstein, p. 191).
Another survey conducted the next year showed
that people were eating half the meat they were
eating five years earlier while consumption of vegetables,
nuts, fruit, cereals, and nuts had soared. Classically
trained chefs were fired and replaced by unskilled
labor who could easily open a can and heat its
contents. These changes in restaurant consumption mirrored those
taking place in American homes.
Food du Jour: A Simple Comparison
In comparing the consumption of food in
1880 to that of 1930, it is easy to see that the primary
differences were twofold. First, in 1880,
people were eating authentic food that was prepared
from scratch. In 1930, people were eating
more processed food, including canned and fresh vegetables
that were unavailable or cost prohibitive in 1880. The post-WWI
consumer was looking for lighter fare (since being “pleasingly
plump” was no longer in vogue),
which consisted of more fruits (especially citrus), more green
vegetables, more milk and cheese, and fewer starches. As a result,
the average height of boys and girls increased
substantially, most likely because of the wider variety
of nutrients available. Secondly, they were consuming
less meat, much more sugar, pasteurized milk and cheeses, Crisco instead
of butter and lard, Campbell’s soup
over homemade stocks and soups, and processed
cereals over traditional egg and meat breakfasts. The
rich, satisfying, made-from-scratch French food high in cream
and butter was all but history.
In other words, contrary to their forefathers in the 1880s, people
in 1930 were ingesting less vitamin A and vitamin D (found in butter,
cream, lard, fish, meat), which are critical for strong blood vessel
walls. They were also receiving fewer minerals important
to a healthy diet (including calcium and magnesium found in
meat, homemade stocks, and unpasteurized milk). Less meat equates to the unfortunate
loss of good, protective fat, and vitamins B6 and B12. Interestingly, deficiencies
in both B6 and B12 are linked to nervous disorders, such as Alzheimer’s,
Parkinson’s, and Lou Gherig’s (ALS) diseases—currently
considered commonplace in the U.S. Conversely, the increase use of Crisco,
a hydrogenated trans fat, as well as, an increasingly excessive consumption
of polyunsaturated vegetable oils, such as safflower, corn, sunflower, soybean,
and cottonseed oils (from which Crisco was made), form free
radicals in the body, interfering with healthy cell production. The replacement
of traditional breakfasts with highly processed white flour, corn,
and white sugar cold cereals that are difficult to digest also deprive
the body of important nutrients.
The medical industry is now looking at high levels of homocysteine
in the blood as an indicator of heart disease. This substance has
been correlated with plaque buildup and clot formation, and therefore foster
ideal heart attack conditions. Nutrients that lower serum homocysteine
levels include vitamins B6 and B12, folic acid, and choline—all
found mostly in animal foods.
Heart disease is a 20th Century affliction derived from
the use of modern, convenience foods, that has led to
malnutrition and stress on the system.
According to Sally Fallon, author of a cookbook entitled Nourishing Traditions,
and founder of the Weston A. Price Foundation, “[p]revention
of heart disease will not be achieved with the current focus on lowering cholesterol–either
by drugs or diet–but by consuming a diet that provides animal
foods rich in protective fats and vitamins B6 and B12; by bolstering
thyroid function through daily use of natural sea salt, a good source
of iodine; by avoiding vitamin and mineral deficiencies that
make the artery walls more prone to ruptures and the buildup of plaque; by including
antimicrobial fats in the diet; and by eliminating processed
foods containing refined carbohydrates, oxidized cholesterol and free-radical
containing vegetable oils that cause the body to need
constant repair”(Fallon, p. 13).
So bring on the butter! Bring on the milk and cream (fresh
from the farm if possible). The higher the “good” fats
the better. Bring on the organic meats, homemade stocks,
plenty of free-range eggs, lots of unrefined, cold-pressed
coconut oil, and fresh vegetables. This type of diet
is much more satisfying, and therefore, cravings for bad fats—bags
of potato chips, fast food, and sweets—will vanish. Eat
nutrient-dense, whole foods for a contented, healthy heart,
and Bon Appetit!
© 2004 Cynthia Cechota, M.S.
To Top
For fascinating reading on the
transformation of the American diet and related topics, Cynthia
recommends the following resources:
Revolution at the Table, by Harvey Levenstein (provides
an extensive bibliography for further research)
No Foreign Food, by Richard Pillsbury
The American Kitchen • 1700 to Present, by
Ellen M. Plante
What’s Cooking, by Sylvia Whitman
The American History Cookbook, by Mark
H. Zanger
American Home Cooking, by Cheryl Alters
Jamison & Bill Jamison
The Untold Story of Milk, by Ron Schmid,
ND
The Sugar Blues, by William Dufty
Nourishing Traditions, by Sally Fallon
Nutrition and Physical Degeneration, by
Weston A. Price
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed
on this Web site are not necessarily those of CreativeRefuge.com
and are not medical advice. Please consult your
doctor prior to making any changes to your existing
diet or exercise regimen.
|